ACEP ID:

Identify

ACEP Pediatric Emergency Department Vaccination Toolkit

Back to Main Page

Identify

How should EDs identify pediatric patients’ vaccination status?

Regional Immunization Information Systems

The working group recognizes that regional immunization information systems vary in their utility and their capability for bidirectional flow of vaccination data.  Moreover, this capability of hospitals to access the regional immunization information system may change with time or with changes in their electronic health record system (EHR).  We recommend that EDs utilize the regional immunization information system to ensure patients’ up-to-date status in situations where hospitals can link to regional immunization information systems and can easily and reliably determine the ED patient’s vaccination status.

Depending upon the ED, staff can obtain access to immunization information systems information in these ways:

  • If the ED utilizes an EHR, check with the system administrators to see if there is an existing connection with the immunization information system. If there is an established connection, the individuals wanting access will likely need to request access from the local system administrators, not from the immunization information system. It might be worth checking the EHR vaccination section to see if there is already immunization information system.
  • If the ED does not utilize an EHR, connect with the state immunization information system. State Immunization Information Systems List (CDC).
  • If the ED does utilize an EHR, but no connection to the immunization information systems, this may be a two-part solution. First, contact the state immunization information system to see if you can get connected via the user interface while you work with the EHR administrators to see if they can work to establish an electronic interface for data exchange. As long as the individual is set up with access to view/add (might be different language on this depending upon the jurisdiction) they should be able to view and add patients and vaccines.  More than 80% of immunization information system data comes from established data exchange (EHR to immunization information system), which is helpful for any person who needs to input the information. In this way, medical staff input immunization records into the EHR, which then automatically sends/receives vaccine data.

Health System Electronic Health Record

For children in an ED that is affiliated with their medical home, the ED’s EHR may connect to an accurate vaccination record. The ED personnel may access this.

Triage Assessment for Vaccination Status

There is little evidence-base regarding best-practices for triage nurse assessment of pediatric vaccination status, especially in the context of utilizing immunization information systems or medical home EHRs. Moreover, there may be difficulties in assessing the nuances of each child’s vaccination status (e.g., a child who seems behind on vaccine according to immunization information systems may be up-to-date in the PCP’s EHR).  

Nevertheless, especially in cases where an ED does not utilize the regional immunization information system, the triage assessment of a child’s vaccination status may be quite relevant in terms of their clinical care and important in terms of identifying under-vaccinated patients. 

For this reason, we recommend that, in the absence of access to a regional immunization information system, triage assessment for vaccination status accomplish two main goals. 

  • The triage assessment for vaccination status quickly determines the children whose caregivers believe that the children are up-to-date. Although this parental belief may be mistaken, for these patients, we recommend no further ED intervention for administering or encouraging routine childhood vaccinations.  
  • For children whose caregiver reports that they are not fully vaccinated, the ED staff might assess the barriers to vaccination in a non-judgmental fashion and assist the caregiver as appropriate.* We recommend the following.     
    • For patients who have identifiable barriers to vaccinations, the ED should provide social work or other linkage services, as appropriate. Note that some EDs may have the capacity to provide routine childhood vaccinations in the ED. In these circumstances, EDs may provide routine childhood vaccinations, as appropriate.
    • For caregivers who are vaccine hesitant, the ED should deliver a non-judgmental, culturally competent recommendation. (See section below.)
    • For caregivers who are vaccine intent with no barriers to primary care, the ED should specifically refer to primary care or vaccination providers. Note that some EDs may have the capacity to provide routine childhood vaccinations in the ED. In these circumstances, EDs may provide routine childhood vaccinations, as appropriate.

*Triage Flowcharts for assessing pediatric patients’ vaccination status are given in the appendix. 

 

Appendix: Triage Flowcharts for Assessing Pediatric Patients’ Vaccination Status

Routine Vaccination Flowchart

routine.vacc.flowchart.jpg

Routine Adolescent Flowchart

routine.adolescent.flowchart.jpg

Seasonal Vaccination Flowchart

seasonal.vacc.flowchart.jpg

Postexposure Prophylaxis Flowchart

postexposure.flowchart3.jpg

 

References

  1. Gordon JA, Goldfrank LR, Andrulis DP, D'Alessandri RM, Kellermann AL. Emergency department initiatives to improve the public health. Acad Emerg Med 1998;5(9):935-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02827.x.
  2. Haukoos JS, Lyons MS, Rothman RE. The Evolving Landscape of HIV Screening in the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med 2018;72(1):54-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.01.041.
  3. Barata IA, Shandro JR, Montgomery M, et al. Effectiveness of SBIRT for Alcohol Use Disorders in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review. West J Emerg Med 2017;18(6):1143-1152. DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2017.7.34373.
  4. Hammouda N, Carpenter CR, Hung WW, et al. Moving the needle on fall prevention: A Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (GEAR) Network scoping review and consensus statement. Acad Emerg Med 2021;28(11):1214-1227. DOI: 10.1111/acem.14279.
  5. Hsu SS, Groleau G. Tetanus in the emergency department: a current review. J Emerg Med 2001;20(4):357-65. DOI: 10.1016/s0736-4679(01)00312-2.
  6. Gibbons K, Dvoracek K. Rabies postexposure prophylaxis: What the U.S. emergency medicine provider needs to know. Acad Emerg Med 2023. DOI: 10.1111/acem.14755.
  7. Slobodkin D, Kitlas J, Zielske P. Opportunities not missed--systematic influenza and pneumococcal immunization in a public inner-city emergency department. Vaccine 1998;16(19):1795-802. DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(98)00183-2.
  8. Rodriguez RM, O'Laughlin K, Eucker SA, et al. PROmotion of COvid-19 VA(X)ccination in the Emergency Department-PROCOVAXED: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials 2022;23(1):332. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06285-x.
  9. Waxman MJ, Ray M, Schechter-Perkins EM, et al. Patients' Perspectives on Emergency Department COVID-19 Vaccination and Vaccination Messaging Through Randomized Vignettes. Public Health Rep 2022:333549221085580. DOI: 10.1177/00333549221085580.
  10. immunize.org. Ask the Experts - Documenting Vaccination. (https://www.immunize.org/askexperts/documenting-vaccination.asp).
[ Feedback → ]