ACEP ID:

Emergency Care in a Post-Roe Era

Implications from the Supreme Court’s decision

Emergency physicians are working to untangle and translate the legal and health-related implications from the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. ACEP has created a cross-disciplinary task force to help identify and develop recommendations to address gaps in existing regulation or statute that could create clinical and legal barriers to how emergency physicians practice emergency medicine. 

ACEP is working with a coalition of leading national medical societies to address legal barriers that hinder emergency physicians’ ability to practice medicine.

This effort includes submitting an amicus brief in United States v. State of Idaho, a case that underscores the state law’s clear conflict with EMTALA. As the brief notes, “the Idaho law is not just a bad law, it’s bad medicine.” 

ACEP also signed onto a brief in Texas v. Becerra that explains how the state of Texas is misunderstanding physicians’ EMTALA obligations and that laws prohibiting emergency physicians from providing appropriate care could put pregnant patients at risk.   

For the most recent federal guidance currently available, please click here

 

State-Level Updates

Learn More

Resources

Regs & Eggs: EMTALA Requirements Remain Fully in Effect in the Post Roe v. Wade World

Compliance Updates for Emergency Physicians

ACEP Now: The Emergency Department After the Fall of Roe: Are You Prepared?

Trauma in the Obstetric Patient: A Bedside Tool

Get Involved

ACEP is working to assess the relevant changes to federal laws and review the clinical policies impacted by the Court’s decision. Through the ACEP Council, emergency physicians will be able to draft, discuss and vote on resolutions that impact policies and best practices. 

Many of the discussions around implementation will occur at the state level. There are numerous opportunities for emergency physicians to get involved with their ACEP state chapter and use their voice to help navigate and shape the changing landscape. There could also be opportunities with ACEP sections or committees examining the impact of the policy changes on clinical practice, state and federal advocacy efforts, communications and more.

 

Public and Policy Statements

Public Statement: Emergency Physicians Deeply Concerned by Laws that Interfere with the Physician-Patient Relationship

ACEP Policy Statement: Interference in the Physician-Patient Relationship

Early Pregnancy

Research

Early pregnancy loss in the emergency department, 2006–2016 - Benson - 2021 (Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open, Volume 2, Issue 6, December, 2021)

They're Doing Their Job”: Women's Acceptance of Emergency Department Contraception Counseling (Annals of Emergency Medicine, Volume 76, Issue 4, P515-526, October 01, 2020)

Emergency Department Use in the Perinatal Period: An Opportunity for Early Intervention (Annals of Emergency Medicine, Volume 70, Issue 6, P835-839, December 01, 2017)

Emergency Physician Ultrasonography for Evaluating Patients at Risk for Ectopic Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis (Annals of Emergency Medicine, Volume 56, Issue 6, P674-683, December 01, 2010)

LIVE CHAT
[ Feedback → ]