I'm looking For:
I want to:
 
Practice Resources > Issues by Category > Clinical
Search in Clinical:   
Use of Intravenous tPA for the Management of Acute Stroke in the Emergency Department

This Policy Resource and Education Paper is an explication of the Policy Statement Use of Intravenous tPA for the Management of Acute Stroke in the Emergency Department.

Policy Resource and Education Paper

Stroke can be a devastating disease for which physicians have had very little to offer in the past. In 1995, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) published the results of a prospective, double-blinded, randomized trial comparing tissue plasminogen activator to placebo in the management of acute ischemic stroke. The study reported that treated patients had the benefit of improved functional outcome but with an increased risk for intracranial hemorrhage. The results were convincing enough to lead to FDA approval of tPA for acute ischemic stroke; Since the NINDS trial there has not been a second randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to validate its findings (ECASS-II had a 0-3 hour from symptom onset arm but the vast majority of enrolled patients were treated outside of the three hour window). There have been at least 8 open label studies since the NINDS results were published that have investigated the safety of intravenous tPA. It has become clear that the use of intravenous fibrinolytics requires well-developed systems in order to maximize benefit and to minimize risk.

Stroke management is very time sensitive and emergency physicians are generally the first physicians to evaluate a patient having an acute stroke; consequently, emergency physicians are often in the position to make critical decisions regarding treatment. The purpose of this PREP is to assist the emergency physician in distilling the literature that has been published regarding intravenous tPA in acute stroke management in order to facilitate establishing the setting in which fibrinolytics can be safely used in patient care.

Table - tPA Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
tPA Indications
These statements must be true in order to consider tPA administration:
  1. Ischemic stroke onset within 3 hours of drug administration.
  2. Measurable deficit on NIH Stroke Scale examination.
  3. Patient's computed tomography (CT) does not show hemorrhage or nonstroke cause of deficit.
  4. Patient's age is >18 years.
tPA Contraindications
Do NOT administer tPA if any of these statements are true:
  1. Patient's symptoms are minor or rapidly improving.
  2. Patient had seizure at onset of stroke.
  3. Patient has had another stroke or serious head trauma within the past 3 months.
  4. Patient had major surgery within the last 14 days.
  5. Patient has known history of intracranial hemorrhage.
  6. Patient has sustained systolic blood pressure >185 mmHg.
  7. Patient has sustained diastolic blood pressure >110 mmHg.
  8. Aggressive treatment is necessary to lower the patient's blood pressure.
  9. Patient has symptoms suggestive of subarachnoid hemorrhage.
  10. Patient has had gastrointestinal or urinary tract hemorrhage within the last 21 days.
  11. Patient has had arterial puncture at noncompressible site within the last 7 days.
  12. Patient has received heparin with the last 48 hours and has elevated PTT.
  13. Patient's prothrombin time (PT) is >15 seconds.
  14. Patient's platelet count is <100,000 uL.
  15. Patient's serum glucose is <50 mg/dL or >400 mg/dL.
tPA Relative Contraindications
If either of the following statements is true, use tPA with caution:
  1. Patient has a large stroke with NIH Stroke Scale score >22.
  2. Patient's CT shows evidence of large middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory infarction (sulcal effacement or blurring of gray-white junction in greater than 1/3 of MCA territory).

Methodology: A MEDLINE search of English language publications was conducted for the period 1995 through August 2001 using the MESH search terms, stroke and tissue plasminogen activator. The reference lists from selected articles were then hand searched. Articles selected for review were read by all members of the subcommittee and evaluated for "design," "findings," and "study limitations." Articles were then graded based on defined criteria:

Therapy* Diagnosis?  Prognosis?
Design/Class I Randomized, controlled trial or meta-analyses of randomized trials Prospective cohort using criterion standard Population prospective cohort
Design/Class II Nonrandomized trial Retrospective observational Retrospective cohort
Case control
Design/Class III Case series
Case report
Other, eg, consensus, review
Case series
Case report
Other, eg, consensus, review
Case series
Case report
Other, eg, consensus, review

* Objective is to measure therapeutic efficacy comparing two or more interventions
? Objective is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests
? Objective is to predict outcome, including mortality and morbidity

Studies were downgraded one or more levels depending on limitations in the control of bias, assessment of outcome, external validity, etc. Essentially, no study's strength could be higher than its design class, but it could be lower based on the number, severity, and relevance of its limitations. The Table below illustrates how this combination of design and execution ratings was used to develop a final strength of evidence assessment for an individual study.

Design/Class I Design/Class II Design/Class III
Downgrading
None I II III
1 level II III X
2 levels III X X
Fatally flawed X X X

An evidentiary table was constructed to summarize study design, findings, and limitations. The final "Class of Evidence" assigned to each study was based on the limitations of the study's methodology and the relevance of endpoints. Those studies that had sufficient bias to affect validity or endpoints different from the single target endpoint chosen by the subcommittee were either downgraded to a lower category, or discarded if fatally flawed.

Evidentiary Table

Study Design Findings Limitations Class of
Evidence
ECASS. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke. JAMA. 1995;274:1017-1025.

Randomized, prospective, multicenter, double blinded, placebo controlled.

Treatment within 6 hours using 1.1 mg/kg.

620 patients; outcome measures of Barthal index and modified Rankin at 90 days.

No difference in mortality and improved outcome in tPA group but incidence of hemorrhage higher.

109 patients included despite major protocol violations.

Most patients were enrolled after 3 hours (average time to treatment was 4.3 hours).

II (downgraded from I due to methodology)
MAST-1. Randomized controlled trial of streptokinase, aspirin, and combination of both in treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 1995; 346:1509-1514.

Randomized, prospective multicenter double blinded.

Four arms: strepto, ASA, both, neither.

Treatment within 6 hours.

622 patients.
No significant decrease in 6-month mortality or disability reported.
Includes patients with symptom onset up to 6 hours prior to treatment. I
NINDS. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. NEJM. 1995 333:1581-1587.

Two parts: Part I double blinded, randomized placebo controlled with a 24-hour assessment using the NIHSS.

Part II 3-month assessment using the BI, RS, NIHSS, GCS.

Treatment within 3 hours using .9 mg/kg.

Part 1: 291patients - no difference in 24-hour outcome between tPA and placebo.

Part II: 333 patients - tPA provided a 32%Relative (12% absolute) better likelihood to have minimal or no disability at 90 days; odds ratio for improvement was 2 (95% CI 1.3 to 3.1).

Increased (6.4% vs. .6%) likelihood of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.

Internally valid demonstrating the efficacy of tPA when given under optimum circumstances; concern continues over its external validity as suggested by the Cleveland study. I
Kwiatkowski. Effects of tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke at one year. NEJM. 1999;340:1781-1787. One-year follow-up of the NINDS trial patients using an intention to treat analysis.

Patients treated with tPA were 30% more likely to have a favorable outcome at one year with no difference in mortality.

Rate of stroke recurrence was the same in both groups; type of stroke had no difference in outcome.

For every 100 patients treated with acute stroke, 11 additional patients would have a favorable outcome.

Supports the findings of the NINDS trial. I
ECASS-II. Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous altepase in acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 1998;352:1245-1251.

Randomized, double-blinded, multi-center using modified Rankin at 90 days.

Stratified 0-3 and 3-6 hour groups.

Only 4.6 % of patients had significant changes in more than one third of the MCA.

No benefit to treatment found though there was a trend toward improved outcome in the few patients treated within 3 hours.

9% symptomatic hemorrhage vs. 3% in controls.

80% of patients were enrolled after 3 hours. I
Chiu. Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1998;29:18-22. Prospective open label 30 patients within 3 hours of stroke onset. 7% symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.
37% recovered to fully independent function.
Small "n."
No control group.
II
Grond. Early intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in a community-based approach. Stroke. 1998;29:1544-1549. Open label monocenter. 100 patients; 26% within 90 minutes.Average time-to-treatment was 126 minutes.At 3 months, 53 patients had fully independent function.
5% symptomatic hemorrhage.

Patients were routinely started on heparin.

Osmodiuretics were used.

No control.

II
Atlantis. Recombinant tissue type plasminogen activator for ischemic stroke 3 to 5 hours after symptom onset. JAMA. 1999;282:2019-2026.

Placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomized, multicenter.

Treatment 0-3, 3-5, >5 hours from stroke onset with 90 day follow-up.

No difference between placebo and tPA in patients treated after 3 hours of stroke onset.

tPA associated with a 7% symptomatic hemorrhage rate vs. 1.1% with placebo.

Mortality was 7% vs. 11%.

tPA offers no benefit when administered more than 3 hours after onset of acute stroke.

Treatment beyond 3 hours of symptom onset. I
Smith. Emergency physician treatment of acute stroke with recombinant tPA. Acad Emerg Med. 1999;6:618-625.

Retrospective, observational review.

4 hospitals; all tPA administered by emergency physicians.

37 patients; symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in 10.8% (4).

Only 9 patients had neurology consult in the ED; 14 patients had no neurology consultation.

57% had normal or improved outcome at time of discharge from the hospital. Average hospital stay was 8 days.

Small number; no 3 or 6-month follow-up.

7 patients had protocol violations; all were tPA beyond the 3-hour window.

III
Cleveland experience. Use of tissue type plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. JAMA. 2000;283:1151-1158. Historical prospective cohort. 70 patients received tPA; 16% had a symptomatic ICH; 16% mortality vs. 5% in those who were not treated. 50% had protocol deviations. III (downgraded for flawed methodology.)
OSF Stroke Network. Treating acute stroke patients with intravenous tPA. Stroke. 2000; 31:77-81. Prospective cohort; 57 consecutive patients treated with tPA within 3 hours with historical controls. At hospital discharge (average 6 days) 47% of patients had no or limited disability; 5% symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate.

5 patients (9%) were treated outside of 3 hours.

Outcome measure was at 6 days vs. 3 months in most other studies.

II
STARS. Intravenous tissue type plasminogen activator for treatment of acute stroke. JAMA. 2000;283:1145-1150.

Prospective, multicenter, consecutive patients (24 academic, 33 community hospitals).

Outcome assessed at 30 days.

389 patients; median time-to-treatment 2 hours, 44 minutes.

30-day mortality 13%; 43% functional, independent.

3.3% symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.

13% treated outside of 3 hours; 33% had protocol violations. II
Akins. Can emergency department physicians safely and effectively initiate thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2000;55:1801-1805. Retrospective review of a prospective stroke registry.

43 patients; 42% had modified Rankin of 0-1.

7% symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.

Protocol deviations were higher when emergency physician administered tPA vs. neurologist: 30 vs. 5%.

Education program decreased protocol deviations from 7 to 1.

Small number; unknown how many patients not included. III (downgraded from a II).
Brain Attack Coalition. Recommendations for the establishment of primary stroke centers. JAMA. 2000;283:3102-3109. Literature review; consensus recommendations. Established 11 criteria for primary stroke centers; some criteria are evidence-based, others have no evidence to support the recommendation such as amount of CME, etc. Limited data to support recommendations. III
Wardlaw J. Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Library. 2001;3:Oxford: Update Software. Evidence-based systematic review of 17 trials including 5216 patients.

Fibrinolytics increase symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage but risks are offset by decreased disability in survivors."

The data is promising and may justify the use of (tPA) in experienced centres in selected patients."

Includes all trials of all fibrinolytics. III
Chapman. Intravenous tPA for acute ischemic stroke: a Canadian hospital's experience. Stroke. 2000;31:2920-2924. A retrospective and prospective review of 46 consecutive patients. Symptomatic hemorrhage occurred in 1 patient. Median time to treat was 165 minutes.At time of follow-up (median 13 months) approximately 45% of patients had a favorable outcome. Small "n."
No control group.
III
CAEP. Position statement on thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke. 2001;www.caep.ca/002.policies/002-02.guidelines/thrombolytic.htm Evidence-based review of the literature.

tPA must be limited to carefully selected patients within established protocols.

tPA should only be administered using NINDS criteria by physicians with expertise in stroke.

CTs should only be interpreted by those with expertise in neuroradiology.

tPA should be limited to centers with appropriate neurological and neuroimaging resources 24/7.

Review. III
National Stroke Association. Stroke: the first hours - emergency evaluation & treatment. Consensus statement. Special edition, 1997. Review. Provided overview of management issues related to stroke. Not evidence-based. III

 
 
 
 
 
RightC_Bookstore
ACEP recommends the following books and resources:
ACEP-PDA-CenterACEP PDA Center

RightC_SpecialEvents

   2010 S/A Sidebar   
    Register Now

©  2010 American College of Emergency Physicians Privacy Policy | Contact Us |