Ethical Issues of Resuscitation
Revised and approved by the ACEP Board of Directors June 2015
Approved by the ACEP Board of Directors June 2008 titled "Ethical Issues of Resuscitation" by combining "Ethical Issues of Resuscitation" approved October 2001 and "Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR in the Out-of-Hospital Setting" approved September 2003
The American College of Emergency Physicians supports the following principles.
- Patients who may benefit from resuscitation efforts should have equitable access to such efforts.
- Decisions to attempt resuscitation must take into account, the accepted standards of medical care and the safety of the medical personnel as well as known patient preferences.
It is appropriate for out-of-hospital providers to honor valid orders to limit life-sustaining interventions at the end of life. Standardized guidelines and protocols should exist in all EMS systems to direct out-of-hospital personnel’s resuscitative efforts. Educational information regarding such policies should be disseminated to the community and to out-of-hospital and hospital providers.
Patient goals for end of life care should be honored by out-of-hospital and hospital providers at the end of life. EMS out of hospital order systems should support efforts to intervene or forgo these treatments based on available information.
The appropriate surrogate decision-maker, as defined by state law, should be involved in decisions regarding life-sustaining treatments if immediately available. Additional sources of information to guide treatment decisions may come from patient advance directives, family, or primary physicians as time permits. EMS systems should honor state-recognized orders addressing life-sustaining treatments such as Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatments (POLST).
If the patient’s goals or medical circumstances are unclear, medically appropriate resuscitative measures should be undertaken. It is ethically permissible for treatments, once started, to be withdrawn when additional information is available. This information may include the lack of response to treatment or definitive information about the patient’s goals for life-sustaining treatments.
Resuscitative efforts may be appropriately withheld, withdrawn or limited in circumstances such as the lack of immediately available resuscitation resources, or when there is no realistic likelihood of benefit to the patient based on existing scientific evidence and reasonable medical judgment.
When resuscitative efforts are not indicated, emergency physicians should assure appropriate medical and psychosocial care during the dying process.